 | |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Doing Business |
Ukraine: Forms |
Ukraine: Digest |
| |
 |
 | |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| World Link for Law spring 2009 |
Bulletin #6 2008 |
#2 2006 |
#1 2004 |
| |
 |
|
 | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Divided into some parts, the seminar took attendees on a journey through the complexities surrounding insurance payments giving separate consideration to the issues that arise in the context of claims handling.
On the ground of their wide practical experience speakers well known for their enthusiasm for the subject as well as being experts in their field:
• reviewed matters relating to reimbursement for ship-owners’ liability insurance
• the impact of local and foreign recent legal and regulatory developments
• offered effective methods of P&I claims handling, what should be done to avoid claims without losing the cover
• explored remedies that P&I Clubs might have against Owners.
• considered topical questions on the issue of “Forwarders: Who are they? To insure or not to insure?”
• offered shipping specialists valuable insights into existing interrelations between all parties to the shipment: shipper - charterer - ship owner.
• stressed the need of legal audit, discussion of terms of contracts, contracting party’s verification to prevent painful deliberations as to against whom to make the claim: the carrier, port, forwarder or …?
• reviewed the legal relations between the assured and the insurer, conflict situations and arising claims from a position of broker. Professional liability need to be insured and the standards and principles of brokers’ professional ethics should be developed as soon as practicable.
• analyzed General Average cases regarding insurance payments, specified typical GA expenditure, reasons to decline claims; also outlined calculation of contributory value, who pay GA and what may affect contributions payable for salvage in GA.
In final inter-active discussion regarding insurers’ role to pave the way for successful and cost-effective shipping the participants were offered useful recommendations and performance criteria for selection of insurance company, which will be capable of ensuring adequate protection to the best advantage of the assured.
The presentations made by insurance companies were distinguished for their optimism.
The insurers emphasized that they enjoy their job and are conscious of their responsibility to the clients for the results of their work. They mainly work with good long-term partners and they understand their problems, offer clear solutions in insurance payments schemes, implement strategies to provide a truly reliable service.
This seminar encouraged exchanging experiences and knowledge through interactive master classes and discussions, which means that participants learned not only from the speakers but also from fellow attendees about current methods of reducing risks and how to avert losses.
Director of Remedy Law Firm Andrey Suprunenko observed in his closing remark: “The combination of detailed presentations, inter-active case studies and practical discussion sessions ensures that these seminars remain dynamic, stimulating and up to date. They provide valuable guidance how to avoid the pitfalls and take advantage of the market in any transaction and attendees have the opportunity to discuss issues with fellow attendees and experts in a relaxed environment. By being among the participants of the Seminar, you will have an opportunity to attract new clients and re-connect to the existing clients, as well as to establish formal and informal contacts with potential partners and investors. We will be glad to welcome you all at the next seminar in September 2010!”
Photo
|
 |
| | |
 | |
| 25 january 2010 Who is Who legal researching project indicated the individual private practice professionals and leading law firms 2010.
Partner of International Law Offices (Interlegal) Mykola Melnykov became one of three legal advisers from Ukraine listed in the 2010 edition devoted to the CIS countries law firms. Mykola Melnikov is the leading expert in sphere of shipping and maritime law in Ukraine.
more details… | |
| | |
|  | |
| 11 december 2009 The lawyers of International Law Offices, Vyacheslav Lebedev and Nadezhda Malanchiy, took part in theoretical and practical conference held on 10 December 2009 in Odessa National Maritime Academy (ONMA) named “Adaptation Problems of the National Legislation of Ukraine to International Seafarers’ Labour Standards”. There were analyzed the provisions of ILO Maritime Labour Convention dated 23 February 2006 and national legislation of Ukraine. The participants of the conference with a keen interest received reports of the lecturers and postgraduates of the Maritime Law and Management Department (ONMA). The discussions were dedicated to the rules fixed by the abovementioned Convention and their correlation with the rules stipulated by the labour laws of Ukraine.
| |
| | |
|  | |
| 11 november 2009 Partner Olena Losevska joined the team working over the TRACECA TEN-T Project in Ukraine. She was involved into the project as legal assistant. Mrs. Losevska provided the EU Commission with the issues on private investments in Ukrainian ports and PPP viability as well as the prohibitions and difficulties connected with the procedure of implementation of investment. (The details on how to invest in Ukraine ports see in publications directory on the web-site). The contributed investigation is to assist how to establish appropriate funding mechanisms.
more details… | |
| | |
|  | |
| 21 october 2009 A new article of Arthur Nitsevych was published on 10.20.09 in dehnenblog.com. 'Milestones of Corporate Governance in Ukraine'
The Global Corporate Governance News a new international platform for sharing knowledge in the corporate governance community.
Yours,
Peter H. Dehnen
www.dehnen.com
| |
| | |
|  | |
| 20 october 2009 Hereby we inform you about a Second Circuit case decided on October 16, 2009, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., which severely limits the scope of the type of property that may be attached pursuant to Rule B. The Court, in sum and substance, held that “electronic fund transfers (“EFTs”) being processed by an intermediary bank are not property subject to attachment under Rule B.” Since EFTs are no longer considered property of either the originator or the beneficiary, it cannot be “defendant’s property” subject to Rule B attachment.
more details… | |
| | |
|  | |
 | News library |  |  |
|